INCOMPETENCY! 😨 Simon Jordan has his SAY on Onana VAR decision | talkSPORT

Feature Image

Summary:

  • Simon Jordan criticizes recent VAR decision and questions referee competency.
  • He emphasizes the importance of acknowledging mistakes and saying sorry in football.
  • Jordan advocates for better referee training and adherence to game principles.
  • He discusses the challenges of implementing transparency in a culture of fan abuse.
  • Jordan contrasts the priorities of transparency and referee competency.
  • He references Howard Webb's promise of increased transparency in refereeing decisions.
  • Jordan highlights the ongoing debate between transparency and competency.


Simon Jordan shares his perspective on a recent VAR decision involving Onana, criticizing the competency of referees and the need for transparency.


Apology for VAR Decision


The PGMOL issued an apology for a VAR decision that impacted the outcome of a recent match, raising questions about the fairness of the decision-making process.

The Value of Saying Sorry


Jordan emphasizes the importance of issuing apologies in football, explaining that saying sorry is the first step towards acknowledging and addressing problems.

Referee Competency and Training


Jordan discusses the necessity of focusing on referee competency and training, pointing out the need to improve decision-making skills and adherence to the game's principles.

Behavior of Players and Timing


Jordan highlights the need for players to behave better on the field and address time-wasting issues, while also underlining the significance of referee competency.

Referee Scrutiny and Misunderstanding


Jordan expresses his advocacy for increased visibility and understanding of referees' roles and challenges, while acknowledging the prevalent misconceptions about referees.

VAR Audio Transparency


Jordan discusses the idea of providing transparency by sharing VAR audio to explain decisions, addressing the challenges of implementing transparency amidst fan abuse.

Transparency vs. Competency


Jordan contrasts the priorities of transparency and referee competency, highlighting that addressing the competency of decision-making is more crucial than explaining the mechanics.

Referee Accountability and Debate


Jordan touches on the possibility of referees being accountable for their decisions and discusses the potential challenges of public debates on referee performance.

Promised Transparency


Jordan references Howard Webb's promise of increased transparency in refereeing decisions, discussing the steps taken to share audio after matches to improve understanding.


In conclusion, Simon Jordan highlights the ongoing debate between transparency and competency in football refereeing decisions, suggesting that while transparency is a step in the right direction, the focus should remain on improving the competency of referees and their decision-making processes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ukraine War: Is the defence of Bakhmut a distraction?

Why the world was wrong about Putin | Analysis

Ukraine War: What missiles have Russia fired?