Summary: Migrants arriving at RAF Weathersfield are being told they can live with relatives in the UK, sparking concerns about the clarity of immigration policies. Local officials express confusion and question the approach, suggesting potential alternatives to discourage illegal crossings. Legal and ethical concerns arise as human trafficking victims cannot be housed in certain facilities according to Home Office guidance. Critics raise doubts about the overall effectiveness of current immigration policies and the ability to detain and deport migrants. ...

The British public have ‘changed their minds’ on migration since Brexit I'm saying Brexit and the 2019 elections were predicated on people's views on migration generally, but particularly legal migration. But we have actually got data that says that, you know, attitudes are changing significantly. Let's take the Ruranda aspect of this, for example, mentioned in your thoughts on that as a policy, because it seems to have two question marks one is practicality is ever actually going to move many people to Rwanda? And secondly, is it going to be palatable to law if we remain in the European Convention on Human Rights? Both of those two questions, I think will come up in the House of Lords. Are they right to push back on Rwanda, do you think? Well, I think it's right for them to challenge the concepts behind the bill, whether they are right to actually challenge the policy...